April 2, 2025
Jazmin Mignaquy
ANZ Marketing Director
This is Part 3 in our series of posts looking at how Linewize Monitor provides all-important visibility that schools need to ensure students are supported on all sides.
Part 1 Rethinking Red Flags: Why Digital Safety Alerts Are Also a Pastoral Responsibility
Part 2 The Evolution of School Monitoring: The Critical Role of Human Oversight
Many schools hesitate to implement digital monitoring tools—often referred to (sometimes unfairly) as 'spyware'—out of concern for the legal risks tied to missing an alert. With the introduction of Australia's Right to Disconnect law, some school leaders have taken this as a signal to hold off entirely, reasoning that if staff can’t be expected to respond after hours, there’s no point in having a system in place at all.
Their concerns are valid. Schools operate under increasing pressure, with a steady rise in digital safety issues and risks, navigating unclear or inconsistent federal and state legislation around duty of care, privacy, and now, after-hours obligations under the Right to Disconnect law. The fear of being held responsible for missing a serious incident is real—and without clear national guidance, many schools understandably err on the side of caution.
But that logic misses the point.
“Monitoring” is a technical function—but what schools really need is pastoral alerting and reporting. These are not surveillance tools. They are tools that provide digital visibility, helping pastoral and wellbeing teams notice what students may never say out loud.
Term |
What It Actually Refers To |
Why It Matters |
Monitoring (tech) |
The backend system that captures and scans student activity |
It’s the engine—but not the outcome |
Pastoral Alerting |
The real-time surfacing of wellbeing-related behaviours |
Helps schools see when a student may be struggling |
Pastoral Reporting |
The structured communication of relevant concerns to appropriate staff |
Enables timely action and intervention |
This is especially true for schools that manage devices or run 1:1 programs. These schools have a unique window into student behaviour—because they control the ecosystem in which much of that behaviour occurs. When students use school-managed devices, especially in 1:1 settings, their digital activity becomes one of the most powerful (and often underused) indicators of wellbeing.
With the right systems in place, these schools can move beyond device management to proactive care:
Many students will never voice their struggles aloud, but they often leave digital signals—searches, journal entries, or messages—that can reveal distress.
These behaviours are happening during school hours, on school-managed devices, when staff are present and able to intervene.
Traditional filtering systems don’t catch patterns or emotional context—they only log individual keyword hits, missing the bigger picture.
The real value of pastoral alerting isn’t about what happens after hours—it’s about what schools can do during school hours, when they can act and already have a duty of care.
If a student searches for “how to end it all” at 11:15am…
If a student writes a distressing journal in a school doc during lunch…
If a student is being bullied in a school-managed chat at recess…
...and no one sees it—because there’s no system to alert the right people during school hours—that’s not just a missed alert. That’s a missed student in need of support.
Avoiding pastoral alerting tools out of fear of missing something after hours overlooks the fact that most issues don’t emerge overnight—they build up over time. Having real-time visibility, contextual insight, and the ability to observe behavioural trends allows schools to act earlier, not just react. Most issues can be caught and addressed during school hours, while the student is still present and surrounded by support.
And there are other costs too—opportunity costs:
Schools don’t need to choose between surveillance and silence. With the right system in place, they can choose visibility and action—during the hours that matter most.
The best approach isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution—it’s a layered strategy. Think of it as a digital safety net:
At the base, you have filtering tools. These are essential for blocking inappropriate content and helping schools enforce acceptable use policies. They’re the first line of defence—critical for managing risk, but limited when it comes to identifying intent or emotional distress.
Above that, sits a more sophisticated layer: pastoral alerting tools like Linewize Monitor. These systems are designed to look beyond access violations and help identify when a student might be engaging in negative online behaviours or showing early signs of disengagement.
A solution like Linewize Monitor is designed to:
This isn’t about replacing filters—it’s about elevating the school’s response capability with a specialised, student-focused layer that complements your existing systems.
It’s not about asking staff to be always on—it’s about making the most of the time they’re already there.
Let’s stop viewing this as a legal liability? And start seeing it as a missed opportunity to identify issues and trends before things become critical.
To discuss whether this type of approach is right for your school, get in touch. We’re here to help you explore what’s possible.
If, throughout this series, you’ve found yourself with questions or would like to explore how these ideas apply to your school, we’d love to hear from you.
Linewize can work with you to:
Get in touch to start the conversation and discuss whether this technology is right for your school setting.
Ne At ySafe, we’ve spent years engaging with young people about some of the most difficult online safety challenges they face. We know that ...
Many schools hesitate to implement digital monitoring tools—often referred to (sometimes unfairly) as 'spyware'—out of concern for the ...
In today’s digital landscape, schools are increasingly adopting systems to gain a deeper and real-time understanding of how students use ...